Son and Foe
 
Home » Film Review: Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, directed by David Yates  
« previous post     next post »

Film Review: Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, directed by David Yates

by Jeremiah Sturgill, posted on July 11, 2007 — 2 comments, filed under Film Reviews, Nonfiction
Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix film poster

Watching the midnight premier of any film is a treat, and the fun gets doubled when the theater is packed and the audience is really into the movie. The true test of whether or not a film is cinematic gold, however, lies in how many members of the audience are portly 11 year olds in capes. By that metric, the opening night of Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix was a smash hit success. Not that there was ever any doubt.

Having somehow avoided watching any of the Potter adaptations that followed the lamentable first effort, I was ecstatic to see that great strides had been made with The Order of the Phoenix, at least when it came to not including 20 straight minutes of laughably bad, CGI-animated Quidditch. Even better, what did end up making it into the film had a fair amount of merit: the obligatory moments of magical wonderment, a dozen CGI-kissed establishing shots to help the audience feel immersed in the world, and a number of fights to the death–one could hardly ask for much more.

The major stumbling block for Harry Potter in this film lies in the form of Cornelius Fudge, who does not buy that Voldemort has returned at all. Somehow the daft git thinks Dumbledore is the real danger, and so he arranges for one of his cronies, Dolores Umbridge, to teach a class at Hogwarts. Once in place, she utilizes a string of flimsy legal pretexts to expand her influence, and before long, she has taken control of the school away from Dumbledore.

As Umbridge reigns over Hogwarts with a matronly fist of iron, Harry goes through a stage of being a whiner-baby who feels all alone and put on and so forth. Then he and the other kids band together to teach themselves the magic Umbridge will not show them. Their secret classes get found out, Harry learns his father was not always a saint, he and his friends have a big confrontation with the badguys, Sirius dies, Dumbledore saves the day, and Fudge finally sees Voldemort for himself so the movie can end with a big helping of “I told you so.”

Watching the plot unfold is quite the frustrating experience. Either Fudge and Umbridge are downright evil–which is a possibility–or they really are the stupidest pair of slugs to ever crawl their way out of the swamp and grow a spine. Viewed in a certain light, the film could even be construed to as a fairly adept allegory of contemporary American politics, enhanced interrogation techniques and all.

The movie will leave most adult viewers content, but not blown away. The film has excellent production values and a great plot to work from, but it is no Princess Bride. (Of course, I say that with my nostalgia goggles firmly in place, so feel free to take it with a box or two of salt.)

One last thing: Rent Matilda before you go see Order of the Phoenix, and play “spot the similarity” while in the theater. It will help pass the time, on the off chance that you find yourself bored.

« previous post     next post »

2 Comments

1
posted by devlocke, July 11, 2007

I hadn’t ever seen ANY of the film adaptations in their entirety (friends kept putting them on as background, until it got to the point that I’d seen so MUCH of them in a sort of half-conscious way that starting one from the beginning seemed like a horrible re-hashing to no reward, since I hadn’t been impressed with anything I had seen) I ended up seeing this before it opened, at the local IMAX theatre, because a friend got tickets.

Personally, I saw it as a total reference to WWII in a number of ways. Firstly, you had Dumbledore as Churchill, screaming at Parliament “We can’t DISarm! Germany’s getting more and more powerful! You fools!” and then you have the establishment blithely ignoring him, and doing all they can to keep things business as usual. Etc. Everyone knows that story. But with that in mind, I kept noticing parallels between Nazi imagery and Ministry of Magic imagery. For example, the seal of the Inquisition or whatever it was called was very swastika-esque, and the big picture in the Ministry (was that Fudge? Crappy seats in an IMAX theatre make stuff really distorted at times) reminded me of pictures of Der Fuhrer! or whatever from WWII flicks. Also, the booming loudspeakers announcing things is another old standby from WWII flicks.

I’m sure there was more, because it was so easy to find stuff when everything was squished and curved. I thought the film as a whole was great, and I’ve decided to give the first three flicks a belated chance on the basis of it - and I’m also going to watch it again when it hits DVD, so I can see it all proper-like.

As far as the ineptitude or vileness of the two main antagonists of the film (odd that Voldemort doesn’t really seem to be a major antagonist), the point was not that they were stupid, or evil, but that they were horribly misguided. I don’t know if you’ve read the books, but the book makes them even more frustrating, while making their position a little more understandable. Essentially, Fudge is… well… the British government during the World War interregnum. Convinced that the people who are crying wolf are either alarmist, or attempting to use fear to gain power in the government, they bury their heads in the sand not out of outright stupidity, or a desire to see Nazis/Voldemort triumph over all that is good, but because they’re so stuck in their conception of the way the world is that they ignore any evidence to the contrary. The “bad” party in the Honor Harrington books is often portrayed in the same light, probably as a reference to the same events in British history.

That’s how I see Fudge. Umbridge? Ehn; I don’t remember her being in the least sympathetic in the book, and she certainly wasn’t in the film. She’s not involved in creating policy, she’s just the type of conservative numbskull who doesn’t question orders, and doesn’t think rules are applicable to people doing “the right thing” and so on, much like… well, a number of Bush appointees, to draw parallels to recent American history for a change. :) Still, I don’t see her as evil in intent.

It’s funny, because I think you were implying you could see the film as a condemnation of the Bush administration, and I walked away wondering if it was a justification of the War on Terror(tm).

2
posted by Jeremiah Sturgill, July 11, 2007

There are a lot more parallels between the film and WWII, but I related it to Bush & Co. because they’re more… present. WWII isn’t even the war to end all wars anymore. (Or was that supposed to be WWI?)

Regardless of anything else, though, the film does come down strongly against torture in the handwriting punishment scenes, the bit with the goofy kid’s parents having been tortured to death, and Potter’s own near-torture experience.

Terrifically bad judgment, btw, is indistinguishable from stupidity =) Kind of like how any sufficiently advanced technology (yada yada yada).

Any War on Terror justifying done in the film would be in the abstract–not in methods. Pretty much everyone is against terrorists killing Americans. Me included! And heck, they’re our there, sure. The methods are the problem, and that is something the film spends significant time on, and not in a pro Bush way.

Politics weren’t supposed to be a big part of my review. The line about the current administration was intended to be a joke, to punctuate my hyperbolic description of the two antogonists’ stupidity. Ah well.

 
 

Leave a comment

 
« previous post   home   next post »