Home » Film Heritage Part Two: Thomas Alva Edison  

« previous post     next post »

Film Heritage Part Two: Thomas Alva Edison

by Jeremiah Sturgill, posted on August 6, 2007 — 4 comments, filed under Videos, Multimedia, Nonfiction
Photograph of Thomas Edison - fair use thumbnail

Thomas Alva Edison (1847-1931) is perhaps the prototypical inventor, famous for the extremely wise words that “genius is one percent inspiration, ninety-nine percent perspiration.” His most prominent contribution in the eyes of the American zeitgeist is most likely the (commercially viable) electric light bulb, but he developed thousands of other devices, including the phonograph and the Kinetoscope, both of which are foundational in the world of cinema.

A list of prominent American inventors would also have to include Ben Franklin and Nikola Tesla, and like those other luminaries, Edison’s career was not without its dark side. While Franklin reads as being insufferably pompous (and insufferably successful) today, and Tesla is a prime example of how closely linked are genius and madness, Edison was in the inventing game almost entirely for the money. The positive aspect of this is that he gave birth to the modern concept of industrial research, the backbone of much of today’s innovation and progress; the negatives are much the same as with any other large business interest.

A number of Edison’s patents were later overturned due to prior art, and he laid claim to the lion’s share of credit for innovations on which numerous individuals contributed major research. He also did whatever was necessary to promote his intellectual property over any alternatives, even if the alternatives were superior. The most famous example would likely be “The War of Currents,” in which Edison pursued a campaign of propaganda and misdirection so as to protect his existing DC electrical infrastructure, instead of attempting to innovate out-compete the new, and entirely more useful, kid on the block, AC electricity.

Educational Video Alert!

But the cat is cute, so it’s okay.

At first glance the Kinetoscope may not seem like much, and that opinion might survive a second and third glance, too. The device is almost comically limited by todays standards, as it was not a screen projection device. Instead, viewers watched the film through a peephole, one at a time. It did, however, create the basic film system that has endured to the present, in which a single strip of film bearing sequential images is passed over a light source. Later the Kinetoscope would be paired with a phonograph, the combination coming to be known as a Kinetophone. Although films remained predominately silent until the late 1920’s, researchers were watching videos with soundtracks as early as 1894 due to Edison’s (and William Kennedy Dickson’s) work.

Monkeyshines, No. 1

The first film shot in the U.S.

Film Montage

The audio track was added by whoever uploaded the video; I believe that originally, these films were silent.

This is Part Two of a multi-part series of posts. Part One discuses Eadweard Muybridge. Part Three discusses Louis Le Prince. Part Four discusses the Lumière Brothers.

« previous post     next post »

2 Comments

1
posted by devlocke, August 6, 2007

Do you really think Franklin comes off as pompous? “Beer is living proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy,” never seemed all that pompous to me at all. Most of his aphorisms have stood the test of time, and have a nice little rhythm to them that makes them easy to remember. I’ve never really read much in the way of longish essays by him tho.

Was Tesla really crazy?

2
posted by Jeremiah Sturgill, August 7, 2007

Tesla was absolutely a genius, but also far outside the realm of normalcy. It’s not truly a bad thing, as it makes him a thousand times more interesting (almost like Monk, only a scientist instead of a detective). From the Wikipedia article about him:

Tesla may have suffered from obsessive-compulsive disorder, and had many unusual quirks and phobias. He did things in threes, and was adamant about staying in a hotel room with a number divisible by three. Tesla was also noted to be physically revolted by jewelry, notably pearl earrings. He was fastidious about cleanliness and hygiene, and was by all accounts germaphobic. He greatly disliked touching round objects and human hair other than his own.

As for Franklin being pompous, a large portion of that perception comes from the language of his time, not necessarily his own personality. Still, he was way too successful to not dislike, at least a little bit. From the Wikipedia article about Franklin’s autobiography:

D.H. Lawrence wrote a notable invective against “Middle-sized, sturdy, snuff-coloured Doctor Franklin” in 1924, finding considerable fault with Franklin’s attempt at crafting precepts of virtue and at perfecting himself.

Franklin is probably one of the most genuinely admirable men of historical significance (*that I’m aware of), regardless.

Links to this post:

  1. Film Heritage Part 1: Eadweard Muybridge - sonandfoe.com on August 6, 2007
  2. Film Heritage Part Three: Off the Beaten Path - Louis Le Prince - sonandfoe.com on August 15, 2007
 
 

Leave a comment

 

 

« previous post   home   next post »